Alleged Artifacts Found in Mexico and Other Central American Countries: Authentic or Hoaxes?
Last night/this morning, Steve Quayle was on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory to announce what his team found in Mexico.
Before the broadcast, these photographs were put on the show's website.
The top image looks familiar, because it was already on this website with similar plaques allegedly from the same temple.
Are the artifacts shown in the article genuine articles? Can Steve Quayle be trusted? Please consider what Steve Quayle said on convicted fraudster Jim Bakker's show broadcast on April 6.
Steve Quayle believes aliens are fallen angels, but he kept referring to them as aliens the whole two hours last night/this morning. Steve Quayle' production company and conference held in Missouri are named after the sixth chapter of Genesis about giants and the Noachian Flood. Steve Quayle previously shared photographs of similar alleged Aztec artifacts in June 2019.
Are the alleged artifacts shown hoaxes or authentic? Many more photographs of similar items said to come from Mexico are displayed on this Facebook page.
More photographs can be viewed on this Pinterest group board.
One reason to suspect the items could be authentic is the sheer volume. There are so many artifacts, if they are hoaxes they would have to come from a secret factory hidden somewhere with forgers producing items continuously. Is that more realistic than the idea of the artifacts having been made across a period of many centuries or perhaps millennia?
Comments
Here are more URLs to relevant pages about alleged artifacts found in Mexico and other Central American countries previously included in other discussions in this forum.
These eight pages show multitudes of photographs as well as multitudes of diverse opinions. Are they enough to tell the complete story?
Here is a URL to an article by Admin about jade stones said to have been found in a cave in Mexico.
Found the article from a link on Pinterest. The top of the webpage says the article is from three months ago, but the bottom says the article was originally posted in 2020 on February, 11. The pictures look familiar. Perhaps that article is like an English translation of that post written in Spanish on squitel.blogspot.com listing the Italian language website segnidecielo.it as the source. Eventually the story was translated to many different languages for global audiences. After many have viewed the photographs and stories, perhaps somebody can verify their veracity.
Steve Quayle is not the first to attempt to produce a documentary about these alleged artifacts found in Mexico and Guatemala. Raul Julia-Levy wished to make a documentary film entitled Revelations of the Mayas 2012 and Beyond that Julia-Levy said had to be released before December 21, 2012, the end of the previous B'ak'tun and beginning of the current B'ak'tun.
In April 2012 Julia-Levy suddenly stopped production of the documentary.
This sensational article from 2012 on in5d.com contains pictures of many of the alleged artifacts.
One year later, there was no release date for the documentary that was due for a theatrical release in late 2012. Please view this article by Joe Martino published seven years ago on December 18, 2013.
This page containing eight footnotes with links on thegreaterpicture.com could be the original source of an identical article aggregated on alien-ufo-sightings.com dated March 3, 2014.
Links and an embedded video are in this story by Admin on June 1, 2015 on mostunusual.com.
This article by Alien UFO Sightings dated September 21, 2016 previously showed some of the approximately four hundred objects found.
No images can be found in the body of the text, but the header remains. However, the images were pinned to Pinterest boards. The images remain there and link to the webpage.
This alert on the website of Steve Quayle's production company sure has a sensational headline. Does anybody agree?
Here is another article about those carved stones. Much more was written in various languages including English, Spanish, German, Italian, Hungarian, Portuguese, and Russian on many websites.
Here is another Pinterest board showing more pictures of those same objects.
Pictures of the objects appeared in tabloid publications in the U.K.
Found links to that article in Pinterest boards on the Pinterest page of Contact in the Desert.
Will somebody talk about the alleged artifacts at this year's Contact in the Desert conference scheduled to take place after Steve Quayle's Extinction Protocols conference? Steve Quayle intends to upstage the U.S. Government's upcoming report from the Pentagon scheduled to take place on June 25, the same day Contact in the Desert is scheduled to take place this year. Imagine members of Congress asking the Director of National Intelligence about fallen angels in the Bible.
The opinion surrounding Steve Quayle is certainly up for debate. On one side a convicted fraudster and yet not a dis- similar background to Eric Von Daniken who had a similar shady past in his formative years, but now treated in such high esteem. Your valid point of the sheer volume of artifacts could support the authenticity.
The difference between Steve Quayle and Erich Von Daniken is that Steve Quayle says beings called extraterrestrial aliens and pagan deities are fallen angels, and Erich Von Daniken says fallen angels and pagan deities are extraterrestrial aliens. Who is correct?
Is it not the same statement?I don't quite understand
The statements are not the same. Steve Quayle says extraterrestrial aliens never visited Earth, going so far as to say there are no extraterrestrial aliens. Steve Quayle says the beings called extraterrestrial aliens in modernity are the same fallen angels that were worshipped as pagan deities in antiquity deceptively passing themselves off as whatever the people of the times were more willing to believe. Erich Von Daniken says extraterrestrials visited Earth in antiquity and says primitive humans who witnessed them recorded their encounters as having been with fallen angels and pagan deities because they had no frame of reference about space travel.
Thanks for clarification Reanemus. I find the Steve Quayle assumptions quite difficult to accept, whilst Erich Von Daniken's assumptions have validity not least through the trouble he went through to establish his theories. Whilst I have not always agreed with every one of Von Daniken's opinions, I feel he has always been on the right track.
Here is a video over thirty minutes long in which host Gerald Clark reacts to videos that show the alleged artifacts.
Should the objects in the box be wrapped in paper or bubble wrap?
Here is an article in The Irish Sun about those spooky sculptures claimed to have been found in a cave in Mexico.
The article is the exactly the same as the one that appeared on alien-ufo-sightings.com and in The Sun. Is The Irish Sun just as untrustworthy as The Sun publication in the U.K.?
I have come across the publication on visits to Ireland and generally speaking your suspicions are correct as it tends to be associated with sleaze /sport as does the UK Sun publication.
This article is also on alien-ufo-sightings.com, and I shared the URL here, but the images are no longer there while they remain visible on this other web page.
Are you aware if these artifacts have been authentically dated?
Yes. Dr. Kathy J. Forti spoke with the lead figure in carbon dating the Ojuelos artifacts, Russian researcher Oleg Elistratov, and wrote, "Elistratov took it upon himself, at his own cost, to bring some of the artifacts to the most preeminent radio carbon testing facility in the country, the test labs at the University of Arizona.
Stone is difficult to carbon date, but four of the stone artifacts found by Elistratov had objects attached to them with a glue-like substance. This type of organic material can be carbon dated using five different tests. The University of Arizona lab results showed that the glue-like substance was at least 8500 – 9500 years old.
They also ran tests on ceramic clay artifacts and estimated they were at least 3500 years old. Some showed they were buried over 900 years ago, which might indicate they are reproductions of older relics. But some of the graystone tablets, first found about six years ago in Ojuelos, are clearly thousands of years old. (Researcher Klaus Dona also used University of Arizona to validate the dating in relics he found in Ojuelos. The dating was similar at around 8000 years old.)"
Crikey 8500-9000 years old !!